FAA Form 337 for Major Repairs: When Deburring Requires Documentation – Shanghai Longguang Industrial Brush
Skip to content

News

FAA Form 337 for Major Repairs: When Deburring Requires Documentation

by 朱雷 25 May 2026 0 Comments

Detailed Guidance on Repair Documentation for Aerospace Maintenance Organizations

In aerospace maintenance and repair, documentation is as critical as the physical work performed. When a deburring operation is part of a major repair to a type-certificated aircraft, engine, propeller, or component, the work must be documented on FAA Form 337 (Major Repair and Alteration). This form serves as the official record that the repair was performed in accordance with approved data and that the article remains airworthy.

For maintenance organizations, understanding when deburring crosses the threshold from routine maintenance to major repair—and therefore requires Form 337 documentation—is essential for regulatory compliance. This detailed guidance explains the requirements, the decision process, and how to properly document deburring-related major repairs.

Important Note: This guide provides general regulatory information. Maintenance organizations should consult with their local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) or a Designated Engineering Representative (DER) for specific compliance determinations. Longguang is a brush manufacturer, not a regulatory consultant.


1. Overview of FAA Form 337

What Is FAA Form 337?

FAA Form 337, "Major Repair and Alteration," is the official form used to document:



Category Description Regulatory Basis
Major Repairs Repairs that might affect the airworthiness of the product 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix A
Major Alterations Changes that might affect the product's airworthiness 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix A

The form is required when performing major repairs or major alterations to FAA-certificated aircraft, engines, propellers, or components.

Why Form 337 Matters



Reason Importance
Legal record Proof that work was performed per approved data
Airworthiness documentation Required for aircraft records
Transfer of ownership Form 337 stays with the aircraft permanently
Future maintenance basis Documents what was done to the aircraft
FAA audit trail Enables FAA to verify compliance
Liability protection Shows work was performed correctly

Regulatory Basis



Regulation Requirement
14 CFR § 43.9 Content, form, and disposition of maintenance records
14 CFR § 43, Appendix A Definitions of major vs. minor repairs and alterations
Advisory Circular AC 43-210A Guidance on approved data for major repairs

For cross hole deburring aerospace , understanding this regulatory framework is essential for compliance.


2. Major vs. Minor Repairs: The Critical Distinction

Appendix A to Part 43 – Major Repairs

Appendix A defines major repairs as those that:



Condition Description
1 If improperly done, might appreciably affect the strength, structure, weight, balance, or reliability of the product
2 Might affect the operation of the product (e.g., flight characteristics, power output)
3 If not done properly, might create a danger to persons or property

Minor Repairs

A minor repair is any repair that does not meet the definition of a major repair.

The "Appreciably Affect" Standard



Regulatory Language Interpretation
"Might appreciably affect" A possibility of significant effect, not certainty
"If improperly done" The standard is based on potential consequence, not actual outcome
"Strength, structure, reliability, operation" Categories that include surface finish and edge condition

For hydraulic system parts processing , a burr left on a hydraulic component could appreciably affect reliability.


3. When Deburring Is a Major Repair

Deburring, by itself, is not automatically a major repair. However, deburring operations can constitute a major repair under several scenarios.

Scenario 1: Deburring as Part of a Welded Repair



Condition Classification Form 337 Required?
Welding on a steel tube fuselage Major repair (Appendix A, para. (a)(1)(v)) ✅ Yes
Deburring the weld area Part of the major repair ✅ Yes (included)

Example: Repairing a cracked engine mount by welding. The deburring of the weld area is part of the major repair and must be documented on Form 337.

Scenario 2: Deburring a Crack or Damaged Area



Condition Classification Form 337 Required?
Stop-drilling a crack Major repair (if beyond manufacturer's limits) ✅ Yes
Deburring the stop-drilled hole Part of the major repair ✅ Yes (included)
Blending out a scratch or gouge May be major if beyond limits ✅ Yes

Example: Stop-drilling a crack in an aircraft skin. The stop-drilled hole must be deburred. Both the drilling and deburring are part of the major repair.

Scenario 3: Deburring a Repaired Surface



Condition Classification Form 337 Required?
Blending a damaged surface beyond limits Major repair ✅ Yes
Deburring the blended surface Part of the major repair ✅ Yes (included)

Scenario 4: Deburring a Structural Component During Overhaul



Condition Classification Form 337 Required?
Routine disassembly, inspection, reassembly Not a repair (maintenance) ❌ No
Replacing a structural component May be major or minor Depends
Deburring a component beyond allowable limits Major repair ✅ Yes

Scenario 5: Deburring a Component Not Covered by Type Design



Condition Classification Form 337 Required?
Deburring a non-structural bracket Likely minor ❌ No
Deburring a decorative trim piece Minor ❌ No
Deburring an engine component per manufacturer's manual Follows approved data Depends on classification

The Decision Tree

text
Is the deburring part of a repair operation?

├── NO (routine cleaning, pre-inspection deburring, finishing of new parts)
│   └── NOT a repair → No Form 337 required

└── YES

    └── Is the underlying repair major or minor?

        ├── Minor repair → No Form 337 required (document in maintenance records)

        └── Major repair → Form 337 REQUIRED
            └── Deburring is part of the documented major repair

For cross hole deburring , a repair that requires cross hole deburring is likely a major repair if on a structural component.


4. The "Good Manufacturing Practice" Exception

What Is "Good Manufacturing Practice"?

In aerospace, "good manufacturing practice" (GMP) refers to standard, accepted practices for producing conforming parts. Deburring is generally considered GMP for machined components.



Activity GMP? Form 337 Required?
Removing sharp edges from a new part Yes Not applicable (new part)
Deburring a part during manufacturing Yes Not applicable (not a repair)
Deburring a part during routine maintenance Maybe Depends (is it a repair?)
Deburring as part of a major repair Part of repair ✅ Yes (the repair)

When GMP Does Not Apply to Deburring



Situation Why GMP Does Not Apply
Deburring is not specified in the type design No basis for acceptable condition
Deburring changes the part from its original condition GMP does not justify deviation
The part has service history limitations Must follow approved repair data
The deburring requires removal of material Material removal is a repair

For aerospace alloy parts processing , even "minor" deburring must be documented in maintenance records.


5. Deburring That Is NOT a Major Repair

Routine Maintenance Deburring



Operation Classification Documentation
Deburring a part during annual inspection Not a repair (maintenance) Logbook entry
Removing a burr from a non-structural bracket Minor repair (if any repair) Logbook entry
Deburring a component per manufacturer's service instructions Follows approved data Logbook or as specified
Deburring a reusable part during overhaul Part of overhaul (not a repair) Overhaul records
Deburring a new part during manufacturing Not applicable Manufacturing records

Documentation for Minor Deburring

Even when Form 337 is not required, deburring operations must be documented in the aircraft's maintenance records (typically logbook entries) .



Entry Element Requirement
Description of work "Deburred [component name] at [location]"
Date Date work was completed
Total time Aircraft/component time
Reference data Any approved data used
Name and signature Person performing or supervising work
Certificate number A&P certificate number
Return to service statement "I certify that this aircraft/component has been inspected and found in an airworthy condition"

For metal parts surface treatment , proper documentation of deburring is a regulatory requirement.


6. How to Properly Document Deburring on FAA Form 337

Form 337 Block-by-Block Guidance



Block Field Deburring-Specific Guidance
Block 1 Aircraft information Complete for the aircraft being repaired
Block 2 Approving person Signed by A&P or IA
Block 3 FAA office Local FSDO information
Block 4 Type of work "Major Repair"
Block 5 Make, model, serial number Specific to repaired component
Block 6 Description of work (narrative) Include deburring as part of repair
Block 7 Conformity statement Part conforms to type design
Block 8 Data reference Approved data used for repair
Block 9 Signature of person performing work A&P certificate number
Block 10 Signature of IA (if required) For annual/100-hour related work

Sample Block 6 Narrative (Deburring as Part of Weld Repair)

Block 6 – Description of Work Performed:

Repaired cracked engine mount (P/N 12345) per manufacturer's Structural Repair Manual (SRM) Chapter 51-20-01, Figure 2, Detail C.

  1. Removed cracked material by machining.

  2. Prepared weld area by grinding and deburred all edges.

  3. Welded using TIG process per SRM specification.

  4. Deburred weld bead and blended smooth.

  5. Inspected for cracks using fluorescent penetrant (FPI) per ASTM E1417.

  6. Deburred all surfaces to remove any sharp edges.

  7. Finished to original dimensions.

  8. Primed and painted per SRM requirements.

All work performed in accordance with approved data referenced in Block 8.

Sample Block 6 Narrative (Deburring Stop-Drilled Crack)

Block 6 – Description of Work Performed:

Repaired fatigue crack at station 123.5 on lower fuselage skin (P/N 67890) per approved data DCN 12345.

  1. Stop-drilled crack ends with #40 drill.

  2. Deburred stop-drilled holes with cross hole brush per SRM 51-10-01.

  3. Installed approved crack stop patch per SRM Figure 4.

  4. Sealed with MIL-S-8802 sealant.

  5. Deburred all fastener holes and patch edges.

  6. Inspected per SRM requirements.

All work performed in accordance with approved data referenced in Block 8.

For cross hole deburring aerospace , the specific deburring method (e.g., cross hole brush) should be documented.


7. Approved Data for Deburring-Related Major Repairs

What Is "Approved Data"?

Approved data is technical information approved by the FAA or an authorized designee for use in performing a major repair or alteration .



Source Type of Data Acceptance
Type Certificate (TC) holder Manufacturer's Structural Repair Manual (SRM) Approved
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder STC instructions Approved
FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD) compliance Approved
FAA Field approval (Form 337 with FAA signature) Approved
FAA Technical Standard Order (TSO) Approved
DER Approved technical data Approved
ODA Organization Designation Authorization data Approved

When Deburring Is Not Explicitly Covered



Situation How to Obtain Approved Data
Deburring method not specified in SRM Use industry standard (e.g., AC 43-210A, SAE standards) as acceptable data
No SRM available Request DER-approved data or field approval
New deburring method Validate and obtain approval

Advisory Circular AC 43-210A

AC 43-210A provides guidance on approved data for major repairs and alterations . For deburring, it references:



Reference Content
Chapter 3 Types of approved/acceptable data
Chapter 5 Airframe data sources
Chapter 7 Powerplant data sources
Appendices Examples of approved data documentation

For hydraulic system parts processing , AC 43-210A is the primary guidance for repair documentation.


8. Documentation Requirements for Outsourced Deburring

When Deburring Is Outsourced

Many maintenance organizations outsource deburring to specialized shops. This does not change the documentation requirements.



Scenario Form 337 Required? Who Completes Form 337?
Repair is major; deburring outsourced ✅ Yes Repair station or A&P who returns part to service
Repair is minor; deburring outsourced ❌ No Logbook entry by returning installer

Supplier Requirements



Requirement Why It Matters
Supplier must use approved data Repair must conform to type design
Supplier must provide documentation Evidence of proper deburring
Supplier must have quality system Ensures consistency
Supplier must be on approved list Acceptable to FAA

Sample Supplier Documentation



Document Content
Work order Deburring specifications, part numbers, quantity
Inspection report Verification of burr removal, edge condition
Conformity statement Part conforms to type design after deburring
Process control records Brush type, RPM, pressure, passes

For automotive manufacturing brushes , automotive requirements are less stringent, but aerospace requires full traceability.


9. Common Mistakes and Audit Findings

Mistake 1: No Documentation for Deburring That Is Part of Major Repair



Problem Consequence
Deburring performed but not listed on Form 337 Incomplete documentation; potential non-compliance
Repair station cannot prove deburring was done per approved data Audit finding; potential civil penalty

Solution: Always include deburring in the Block 6 narrative when deburring is part of a major repair.

Mistake 2: Using Unapproved Deburring Methods on Major Repairs



Problem Consequence
Wire wheel used on critical component FOD risk; potential damage
Method not specified in approved data May not be acceptable

Solution: Use FOD-safe brushes (cross hole brushes, ceramic fiber brushes) and follow approved data.

Mistake 3: No Traceability of Deburring Tools



Problem Consequence
Cannot prove brush was in acceptable condition Questions about work quality
Missing brush log No evidence of pre-use inspection

Solution: Implement brush logs and tool control (shadow boards).

Mistake 4: Deburring a Part Beyond Allowable Limits



Problem Consequence
Removed too much material while deburring Part may be scrap
Changed edge radius beyond specification May affect fatigue life

Solution: Follow limits specified in approved data; use controlled parameters.

For FOD prevention , tool control is essential for audit compliance.


10. Best Practices for Deburring Documentation

Pre-Work Documentation



Document Purpose
Work order Defines deburring requirements
Approved data (SRM, etc.) Provides method and limits
Tool control record Brush ID, inspection status
Operator qualification Proof of training

During-Work Documentation



Document Purpose
Process parameter log RPM, pressure, passes, brush ID
Inspection record Pre-use brush inspection
Work in process inspection Ongoing verification

Post-Work Documentation



Document Purpose
Final inspection record Verification of burr removal
Form 337 (if major repair) Official FAA record
Logbook entry Record of work performed
Brush log update Track brush usage and wear

Documentation Retention



Document Retention Period Regulatory Basis
FAA Form 337 Permanently with aircraft Part 43.9, AC 43-210A
Logbook entries Permanently with aircraft Part 43.9
Supporting records 2 years minimum Part 43.9
Training records Employment + 5 years Part 43.9

For metal precision machining , documentation retention is critical for audit readiness.


11. Longguang's FOD-Safe Brushes for Repair Operations



Product Best Repair Application Documentation Benefit
Cross Hole Brush Deburring stop-drilled holes, internal repairs Non-metallic; no FOD risk
Ceramic Fiber Disc Brush Surface preparation, weld area deburring FOD-safe; traceable
Ceramic Fiber End Brush Accessing internal features during repair No iron contamination

Why Longguang Supports Regulatory Compliance



Advantage Regulatory Benefit
FOD-safe design Supports FOD prevention programs
No metallic shedding Eliminates wire FOD risk
Traceable lot numbers Full material traceability for audits
ISO 9001:2015 certified Supply chain confidence
Documentation available Product specifications, inspection criteria

For more information, please visit:


12. Conclusion

FAA Form 337 is required when deburring is part of a major repair—a repair that might appreciably affect the strength, structure, reliability, or operation of an aircraft, engine, propeller, or component.

Key Takeaways for Maintenance Organizations



If Deburring Is... Form 337 Required? Documentation Required
Routine maintenance (cleaning, inspection) ❌ No Logbook entry
Minor repair ❌ No Logbook entry
Part of a major repair (weld, crack stop, blend) ✅ Yes Form 337 (include deburring in Block 6)
Performed on a non-structural part ❌ No Logbook entry
On a new part during manufacturing N/A Manufacturing records

The Bottom Line



Question Answer
Does deburring itself require Form 337? Not alone—only if part of a major repair
How do I know if the repair is major? Apply Appendix A criteria
What if I am unsure? Consult your FSDO or DER
What if I do nothing? Potential non-compliance, audit finding, civil penalty

Need a FOD-safe brush for repair deburring?
Send us your repair type, component material, and deburring requirements.
Our engineering team will recommend the right cross hole brush for your application.
Request a Quote

Longguang – Your Partner in FOD-Safe Aircraft Repair

Prev Post
Next Post

Leave a comment

All blog comments are checked prior to publishing

Thanks for subscribing!

This email has been registered!

Shop the look

Choose Options

Edit Option
Back In Stock Notification
this is just a warning