FAA Form 337 for Major Repairs: When Deburring Requires Documentation
Detailed Guidance on Repair Documentation for Aerospace Maintenance Organizations
In aerospace maintenance and repair, documentation is as critical as the physical work performed. When a deburring operation is part of a major repair to a type-certificated aircraft, engine, propeller, or component, the work must be documented on FAA Form 337 (Major Repair and Alteration). This form serves as the official record that the repair was performed in accordance with approved data and that the article remains airworthy.
For maintenance organizations, understanding when deburring crosses the threshold from routine maintenance to major repair—and therefore requires Form 337 documentation—is essential for regulatory compliance. This detailed guidance explains the requirements, the decision process, and how to properly document deburring-related major repairs.
Important Note: This guide provides general regulatory information. Maintenance organizations should consult with their local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) or a Designated Engineering Representative (DER) for specific compliance determinations. Longguang is a brush manufacturer, not a regulatory consultant.
1. Overview of FAA Form 337
What Is FAA Form 337?
FAA Form 337, "Major Repair and Alteration," is the official form used to document:
| Category | Description | Regulatory Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Major Repairs | Repairs that might affect the airworthiness of the product | 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix A |
| Major Alterations | Changes that might affect the product's airworthiness | 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix A |
The form is required when performing major repairs or major alterations to FAA-certificated aircraft, engines, propellers, or components.
Why Form 337 Matters
| Reason | Importance |
|---|---|
| Legal record | Proof that work was performed per approved data |
| Airworthiness documentation | Required for aircraft records |
| Transfer of ownership | Form 337 stays with the aircraft permanently |
| Future maintenance basis | Documents what was done to the aircraft |
| FAA audit trail | Enables FAA to verify compliance |
| Liability protection | Shows work was performed correctly |
Regulatory Basis
| Regulation | Requirement |
|---|---|
| 14 CFR § 43.9 | Content, form, and disposition of maintenance records |
| 14 CFR § 43, Appendix A | Definitions of major vs. minor repairs and alterations |
| Advisory Circular AC 43-210A | Guidance on approved data for major repairs |
For cross hole deburring aerospace , understanding this regulatory framework is essential for compliance.
2. Major vs. Minor Repairs: The Critical Distinction
Appendix A to Part 43 – Major Repairs
Appendix A defines major repairs as those that:
| Condition | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | If improperly done, might appreciably affect the strength, structure, weight, balance, or reliability of the product |
| 2 | Might affect the operation of the product (e.g., flight characteristics, power output) |
| 3 | If not done properly, might create a danger to persons or property |
Minor Repairs
A minor repair is any repair that does not meet the definition of a major repair.
The "Appreciably Affect" Standard
| Regulatory Language | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| "Might appreciably affect" | A possibility of significant effect, not certainty |
| "If improperly done" | The standard is based on potential consequence, not actual outcome |
| "Strength, structure, reliability, operation" | Categories that include surface finish and edge condition |
For hydraulic system parts processing , a burr left on a hydraulic component could appreciably affect reliability.
3. When Deburring Is a Major Repair
Deburring, by itself, is not automatically a major repair. However, deburring operations can constitute a major repair under several scenarios.
Scenario 1: Deburring as Part of a Welded Repair
| Condition | Classification | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Welding on a steel tube fuselage | Major repair (Appendix A, para. (a)(1)(v)) | ✅ Yes |
| Deburring the weld area | Part of the major repair | ✅ Yes (included) |
Example: Repairing a cracked engine mount by welding. The deburring of the weld area is part of the major repair and must be documented on Form 337.
Scenario 2: Deburring a Crack or Damaged Area
| Condition | Classification | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Stop-drilling a crack | Major repair (if beyond manufacturer's limits) | ✅ Yes |
| Deburring the stop-drilled hole | Part of the major repair | ✅ Yes (included) |
| Blending out a scratch or gouge | May be major if beyond limits | ✅ Yes |
Example: Stop-drilling a crack in an aircraft skin. The stop-drilled hole must be deburred. Both the drilling and deburring are part of the major repair.
Scenario 3: Deburring a Repaired Surface
| Condition | Classification | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Blending a damaged surface beyond limits | Major repair | ✅ Yes |
| Deburring the blended surface | Part of the major repair | ✅ Yes (included) |
Scenario 4: Deburring a Structural Component During Overhaul
| Condition | Classification | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Routine disassembly, inspection, reassembly | Not a repair (maintenance) | ❌ No |
| Replacing a structural component | May be major or minor | Depends |
| Deburring a component beyond allowable limits | Major repair | ✅ Yes |
Scenario 5: Deburring a Component Not Covered by Type Design
| Condition | Classification | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Deburring a non-structural bracket | Likely minor | ❌ No |
| Deburring a decorative trim piece | Minor | ❌ No |
| Deburring an engine component per manufacturer's manual | Follows approved data | Depends on classification |
The Decision Tree
Is the deburring part of a repair operation? │ ├── NO (routine cleaning, pre-inspection deburring, finishing of new parts) │ └── NOT a repair → No Form 337 required │ └── YES │ └── Is the underlying repair major or minor? │ ├── Minor repair → No Form 337 required (document in maintenance records) │ └── Major repair → Form 337 REQUIRED └── Deburring is part of the documented major repair
For cross hole deburring , a repair that requires cross hole deburring is likely a major repair if on a structural component.
4. The "Good Manufacturing Practice" Exception
What Is "Good Manufacturing Practice"?
In aerospace, "good manufacturing practice" (GMP) refers to standard, accepted practices for producing conforming parts. Deburring is generally considered GMP for machined components.
| Activity | GMP? | Form 337 Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Removing sharp edges from a new part | Yes | Not applicable (new part) |
| Deburring a part during manufacturing | Yes | Not applicable (not a repair) |
| Deburring a part during routine maintenance | Maybe | Depends (is it a repair?) |
| Deburring as part of a major repair | Part of repair | ✅ Yes (the repair) |
When GMP Does Not Apply to Deburring
| Situation | Why GMP Does Not Apply |
|---|---|
| Deburring is not specified in the type design | No basis for acceptable condition |
| Deburring changes the part from its original condition | GMP does not justify deviation |
| The part has service history limitations | Must follow approved repair data |
| The deburring requires removal of material | Material removal is a repair |
For aerospace alloy parts processing , even "minor" deburring must be documented in maintenance records.
5. Deburring That Is NOT a Major Repair
Routine Maintenance Deburring
| Operation | Classification | Documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Deburring a part during annual inspection | Not a repair (maintenance) | Logbook entry |
| Removing a burr from a non-structural bracket | Minor repair (if any repair) | Logbook entry |
| Deburring a component per manufacturer's service instructions | Follows approved data | Logbook or as specified |
| Deburring a reusable part during overhaul | Part of overhaul (not a repair) | Overhaul records |
| Deburring a new part during manufacturing | Not applicable | Manufacturing records |
Documentation for Minor Deburring
Even when Form 337 is not required, deburring operations must be documented in the aircraft's maintenance records (typically logbook entries) .
| Entry Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Description of work | "Deburred [component name] at [location]" |
| Date | Date work was completed |
| Total time | Aircraft/component time |
| Reference data | Any approved data used |
| Name and signature | Person performing or supervising work |
| Certificate number | A&P certificate number |
| Return to service statement | "I certify that this aircraft/component has been inspected and found in an airworthy condition" |
For metal parts surface treatment , proper documentation of deburring is a regulatory requirement.
6. How to Properly Document Deburring on FAA Form 337
Form 337 Block-by-Block Guidance
| Block | Field | Deburring-Specific Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | Aircraft information | Complete for the aircraft being repaired |
| Block 2 | Approving person | Signed by A&P or IA |
| Block 3 | FAA office | Local FSDO information |
| Block 4 | Type of work | "Major Repair" |
| Block 5 | Make, model, serial number | Specific to repaired component |
| Block 6 | Description of work (narrative) | Include deburring as part of repair |
| Block 7 | Conformity statement | Part conforms to type design |
| Block 8 | Data reference | Approved data used for repair |
| Block 9 | Signature of person performing work | A&P certificate number |
| Block 10 | Signature of IA (if required) | For annual/100-hour related work |
Sample Block 6 Narrative (Deburring as Part of Weld Repair)
Block 6 – Description of Work Performed:
Repaired cracked engine mount (P/N 12345) per manufacturer's Structural Repair Manual (SRM) Chapter 51-20-01, Figure 2, Detail C.
Removed cracked material by machining.
Prepared weld area by grinding and deburred all edges.
Welded using TIG process per SRM specification.
Deburred weld bead and blended smooth.
Inspected for cracks using fluorescent penetrant (FPI) per ASTM E1417.
Deburred all surfaces to remove any sharp edges.
Finished to original dimensions.
Primed and painted per SRM requirements.
All work performed in accordance with approved data referenced in Block 8.
Sample Block 6 Narrative (Deburring Stop-Drilled Crack)
Block 6 – Description of Work Performed:
Repaired fatigue crack at station 123.5 on lower fuselage skin (P/N 67890) per approved data DCN 12345.
Stop-drilled crack ends with #40 drill.
Deburred stop-drilled holes with cross hole brush per SRM 51-10-01.
Installed approved crack stop patch per SRM Figure 4.
Sealed with MIL-S-8802 sealant.
Deburred all fastener holes and patch edges.
Inspected per SRM requirements.
All work performed in accordance with approved data referenced in Block 8.
For cross hole deburring aerospace , the specific deburring method (e.g., cross hole brush) should be documented.
7. Approved Data for Deburring-Related Major Repairs
What Is "Approved Data"?
Approved data is technical information approved by the FAA or an authorized designee for use in performing a major repair or alteration .
| Source | Type of Data | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Type Certificate (TC) holder | Manufacturer's Structural Repair Manual (SRM) | Approved |
| Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder | STC instructions | Approved |
| FAA | Airworthiness Directive (AD) compliance | Approved |
| FAA | Field approval (Form 337 with FAA signature) | Approved |
| FAA | Technical Standard Order (TSO) | Approved |
| DER | Approved technical data | Approved |
| ODA | Organization Designation Authorization data | Approved |
When Deburring Is Not Explicitly Covered
| Situation | How to Obtain Approved Data |
|---|---|
| Deburring method not specified in SRM | Use industry standard (e.g., AC 43-210A, SAE standards) as acceptable data |
| No SRM available | Request DER-approved data or field approval |
| New deburring method | Validate and obtain approval |
Advisory Circular AC 43-210A
AC 43-210A provides guidance on approved data for major repairs and alterations . For deburring, it references:
| Reference | Content |
|---|---|
| Chapter 3 | Types of approved/acceptable data |
| Chapter 5 | Airframe data sources |
| Chapter 7 | Powerplant data sources |
| Appendices | Examples of approved data documentation |
For hydraulic system parts processing , AC 43-210A is the primary guidance for repair documentation.
8. Documentation Requirements for Outsourced Deburring
When Deburring Is Outsourced
Many maintenance organizations outsource deburring to specialized shops. This does not change the documentation requirements.
| Scenario | Form 337 Required? | Who Completes Form 337? |
|---|---|---|
| Repair is major; deburring outsourced | ✅ Yes | Repair station or A&P who returns part to service |
| Repair is minor; deburring outsourced | ❌ No | Logbook entry by returning installer |
Supplier Requirements
| Requirement | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Supplier must use approved data | Repair must conform to type design |
| Supplier must provide documentation | Evidence of proper deburring |
| Supplier must have quality system | Ensures consistency |
| Supplier must be on approved list | Acceptable to FAA |
Sample Supplier Documentation
| Document | Content |
|---|---|
| Work order | Deburring specifications, part numbers, quantity |
| Inspection report | Verification of burr removal, edge condition |
| Conformity statement | Part conforms to type design after deburring |
| Process control records | Brush type, RPM, pressure, passes |
For automotive manufacturing brushes , automotive requirements are less stringent, but aerospace requires full traceability.
9. Common Mistakes and Audit Findings
Mistake 1: No Documentation for Deburring That Is Part of Major Repair
| Problem | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Deburring performed but not listed on Form 337 | Incomplete documentation; potential non-compliance |
| Repair station cannot prove deburring was done per approved data | Audit finding; potential civil penalty |
Solution: Always include deburring in the Block 6 narrative when deburring is part of a major repair.
Mistake 2: Using Unapproved Deburring Methods on Major Repairs
| Problem | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Wire wheel used on critical component | FOD risk; potential damage |
| Method not specified in approved data | May not be acceptable |
Solution: Use FOD-safe brushes (cross hole brushes, ceramic fiber brushes) and follow approved data.
Mistake 3: No Traceability of Deburring Tools
| Problem | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Cannot prove brush was in acceptable condition | Questions about work quality |
| Missing brush log | No evidence of pre-use inspection |
Solution: Implement brush logs and tool control (shadow boards).
Mistake 4: Deburring a Part Beyond Allowable Limits
| Problem | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Removed too much material while deburring | Part may be scrap |
| Changed edge radius beyond specification | May affect fatigue life |
Solution: Follow limits specified in approved data; use controlled parameters.
For FOD prevention , tool control is essential for audit compliance.
10. Best Practices for Deburring Documentation
Pre-Work Documentation
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Work order | Defines deburring requirements |
| Approved data (SRM, etc.) | Provides method and limits |
| Tool control record | Brush ID, inspection status |
| Operator qualification | Proof of training |
During-Work Documentation
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Process parameter log | RPM, pressure, passes, brush ID |
| Inspection record | Pre-use brush inspection |
| Work in process inspection | Ongoing verification |
Post-Work Documentation
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Final inspection record | Verification of burr removal |
| Form 337 (if major repair) | Official FAA record |
| Logbook entry | Record of work performed |
| Brush log update | Track brush usage and wear |
Documentation Retention
| Document | Retention Period | Regulatory Basis |
|---|---|---|
| FAA Form 337 | Permanently with aircraft | Part 43.9, AC 43-210A |
| Logbook entries | Permanently with aircraft | Part 43.9 |
| Supporting records | 2 years minimum | Part 43.9 |
| Training records | Employment + 5 years | Part 43.9 |
For metal precision machining , documentation retention is critical for audit readiness.
11. Longguang's FOD-Safe Brushes for Repair Operations
| Product | Best Repair Application | Documentation Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Cross Hole Brush | Deburring stop-drilled holes, internal repairs | Non-metallic; no FOD risk |
| Ceramic Fiber Disc Brush | Surface preparation, weld area deburring | FOD-safe; traceable |
| Ceramic Fiber End Brush | Accessing internal features during repair | No iron contamination |
Why Longguang Supports Regulatory Compliance
| Advantage | Regulatory Benefit |
|---|---|
| FOD-safe design | Supports FOD prevention programs |
| No metallic shedding | Eliminates wire FOD risk |
| Traceable lot numbers | Full material traceability for audits |
| ISO 9001:2015 certified | Supply chain confidence |
| Documentation available | Product specifications, inspection criteria |
For more information, please visit:
12. Conclusion
FAA Form 337 is required when deburring is part of a major repair—a repair that might appreciably affect the strength, structure, reliability, or operation of an aircraft, engine, propeller, or component.
Key Takeaways for Maintenance Organizations
| If Deburring Is... | Form 337 Required? | Documentation Required |
|---|---|---|
| Routine maintenance (cleaning, inspection) | ❌ No | Logbook entry |
| Minor repair | ❌ No | Logbook entry |
| Part of a major repair (weld, crack stop, blend) | ✅ Yes | Form 337 (include deburring in Block 6) |
| Performed on a non-structural part | ❌ No | Logbook entry |
| On a new part during manufacturing | N/A | Manufacturing records |
The Bottom Line
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Does deburring itself require Form 337? | Not alone—only if part of a major repair |
| How do I know if the repair is major? | Apply Appendix A criteria |
| What if I am unsure? | Consult your FSDO or DER |
| What if I do nothing? | Potential non-compliance, audit finding, civil penalty |
Need a FOD-safe brush for repair deburring?
Send us your repair type, component material, and deburring requirements.
Our engineering team will recommend the right cross hole brush for your application.
Request a Quote
Longguang – Your Partner in FOD-Safe Aircraft Repair

















